Fri Jun 11 06:55:35 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Multiple slaves
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony vs. erserver?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: "Jeff" <threshar at torgo.978.org> > > If nodes 2 and 3 are both slaves of node 1, what paths and listen > > entries should I establish? > > All nodes need paths and listen's for each other. This can get a bit > tedious if you have a lot of slaves (Someday we'll have a tool to make > it easy). I run slony with 5 slaves and it does fine. > > so if you have nodes 1,2,3 > you need listens from 1-2, 1-3, 2-1, 2-3, 3-1, 3-2 > and paths of the same. Thanks for that. I'd thought that was the way I had it. Since there were some problems with the list earlier in the week, I emailed Jan directly and was pointed at the slony_setup.pl perl script. That works for the situation. While I had: store listen ( origin = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 2 ); store listen ( origin = 2, provider = 2, receiver = 1 ); store listen ( origin = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 3 ); store listen ( origin = 3, provider = 3, receiver = 1 ); store listen ( origin = 2, provider = 2, receiver = 3 ); store listen ( origin = 3, provider = 3, receiver = 2 ); the perl script produced: store listen ( origin = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 2 ); store listen ( origin = 2, provider = 2, receiver = 1 ); store listen ( origin = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 3 ); store listen ( origin = 3, provider = 3, receiver = 1 ); store listen ( origin = 2, provider = 1, receiver = 3 ); store listen ( origin = 3, provider = 1, receiver = 2 ); Note the origin != provider for 2<->3. Can someone explain (or point me to the bit of the doc that explains) the topology required please? Julian Scarfe
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Multiple slaves
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony vs. erserver?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list