Fri Nov 4 13:48:12 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] question about type consistency
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote: > Another thought. > > Do we want to be using 'ddl' in these names or something else > (sl_log_script?) > > The scripts you submit with EXECUTE SCRIPT don't need to contain DDL. If I > often do bulk updates/deletes of tables I might choose to route those > through slonik/EXECUTE SCRIPT instead of via psql. > > Also if I have some function that has side-effects outside the database (or > even to non replicated tables) and you want that function to run on all > nodes you might also use execute script. Sure, that sounds quite apropos. Changed already.
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] question about type consistency
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list