Fri Nov 4 13:33:41 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11-11-04 04:15 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Steve Singer<ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote: >> Does this seem cleaner? >> >> create table @NAMESPACE at .sl_log_ddl ( >> log_origin int4, >> log_txid bigint, >> log_actionseq int8, >> log_query text >> ) WITHOUT OIDS; > > Ah, yes, that seems like a fine justification. Works for me, I'll > change forthwith. Another thought. Do we want to be using 'ddl' in these names or something else (sl_log_script?) The scripts you submit with EXECUTE SCRIPT don't need to contain DDL. If I often do bulk updates/deletes of tables I might choose to route those through slonik/EXECUTE SCRIPT instead of via psql. Also if I have some function that has side-effects outside the database (or even to non replicated tables) and you want that function to run on all nodes you might also use execute script.
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] DDL revisions in view of COPY protocol changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list