On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote:
> On 11-07-08 06:57 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>
>> I have a would-be merge-in of the latest bug#218 changes under way;
>> hopefully will complete that Monday.
>>
>> I ran thru the regression tests, and had a pretty mixed result, as
>> follows:
>>
>> ->  % cat testResult.test.txt
>> 1,17,test1
>> 9,0,testdatestyles
>> 7,20,testddl
>
> testddl can fail due to EXECUTE SCRIPT race conditions. I remember you
> talking about an WIP patch to that issue for 2.2.  (this is putting the DDL
> in sl_log)

Ah, yes.  Bug #137.
http://bugs.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137
https://github.com/cbbrowne/slony1-engine/tree/bug137

I haven't touched it in a while - seems proper to wait until we're
done with 2.1 release.

The one piece of the merge that has left me uncertain is that at one
point, MOVE SET was locking sl_event_lock, but some versions are
locking sl_config_lock instead.

I *think* it ought to just be sl_config_lock, right?