Fri Sep 28 09:49:02 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/28/2007 12:01 PM, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 9/28/07, Jan Wieck <JanWieck at yahoo.com> wrote: >> On 9/28/2007 10:33 AM, Marko Kreen wrote: >> > On 9/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> "Marko Kreen" <markokr at gmail.com> writes: >> >> > bool txid_not_visible_in_snapshot(int8, snap) >> >> >> >> The last seems pretty thoroughly redundant? >> > >> > Ehhee. Jan, it's 2:1 now. I also think it unecessary. >> >> Yeah, yeah ... I can live without it. It's just, from that point of view >> half of all comparison operators are redundant ;-) > > I think the point is that this is relatively complex operation. > So having separate function in a small API that is just a NOT > of a complex operation seems "unbalanced". Ignore my wiggling and drop that function already, will ya ;-) Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list