til I am ready to add them to the set, is this correct?

Shaun McCloud, MCDST | Associate Software Developer
Geo-Comm Inc. | www.geo-comm.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Browne [mailto:cbbrowne at afilias.info]=20
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:53
To: Shaun McCloud
Cc: slony1-general at lists.slony.info
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Run pgAdmin II Slony-I Creation scripts outsi=
de of pgAdmin III?

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Shaun McCloud <smccloud at geo-comm.com> wrot=
e:
> Ok,
>
> I will do more research using that method. =A0I was planning on allowing =
a user to run the app on the Master node and each slave node to allow then =
to add one slave at a time (due to the fact that we must maintain 100% upti=
me in the event of a schema change). =A0That shouldn't be an issue when usi=
ng Slonik directly, correct?

Everything that can be configured can certainly be configured using Slonik;=
 its use shouldn't restrict you in any additional ways.

I don't imagine you can actually get "100% uptime," but that's a broader is=
sue not particularly relevant to this.  There are some actions that are lik=
ely to lead to some locking of database objects (see the Slony documentatio=
n; each Slonik command has a section describing locking implications) that =
would effectively lower uptime from 100%.