Tue Nov 28 06:06:15 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] the move
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SCM migration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/28/2006 3:43 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > Vivek Khera wrote: >> Based on discussions in IRC earlier today, I'm posting this message to >> move along the process of moving the slony project to some more >> reliable infrastructure. >> >> The consensus has been reached on the following: >> >> 1) to accept Command Prompt's offer to provide a server >> 2) to keep the repository as CVS >> 3) migrate the mailman list+archives to this server >> > Agreeable to me; I'd like to consider moving to some other SCM, > preferably something inherently distributed, like > {Git|Mercurial|Darcs|Monotone} (where that's probably in decreasing > order of preference). What existing problem would that solve and what possible new problems would that eventually introduce? >> I think it would be cool to make this box answer to >> http://www.slony.info/ rather than having that URL redirect to some >> other name. This will help reduce confusion too, I think. >> > That can doubtless be arranged. Since it is my domain ... >> Open items: >> >> 1) which issue/bug tracker? the two options are: cvstrac (which gives >> us a free >> wiki and source browser in the process) or piggy-back on CMD's >> bugzilla. >> > cvstrac has the regrettable demerit that it may discourage migrating to > another SCM later. I'd prefer to have the independence provided by > using a separate tool. Again, what do we actually try to fix with moving away from CVS? >> 2) if/how to migrate existing tickets (open tix only, or closed tix too)? >> > I think a fine arrangement would be to migrate, by hand, anything that's > still open, and set up, for posterity, some sort of "hall of (f|sh)ame" > report based on pulling what we can out of the old system. Josh Drake > indicated that he could get access to the old data, as database; having > something that's read-only based on that would be slick. >> Also, can the CMD folks comment on what kind of timetable is >> reasonable to do the move? > As soon as a box is available, we should arrange to do a dry run, and > make sure that we've got enough services functioning to arrange for a > full cutover. > > Jan has been pulling regular dumps of CVS from gBorg, and I'm pulling > copies from him, periodically, so we should be in a position to be able > to set up CVS and other services, make sure all is working, and then > update with a fresh dump before finalizing that the cutover is done. I have a daily rsync of the entire gborg CVS root. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] the move
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SCM migration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list