On 1/23/2006 6:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:32:12AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> ?hel kenal p?eval, R, 2006-01-20 kell 16:47, kirjutas Andrew Sullivan:
>> 
>> > But would I use Slony as the _only_ wheel in my HA machine?  Not on a
>> > bet.
>> 
>> Wise choice, as currently Slony *IS* broken by design (see my last mail
>> on the subject). But you only notice this brokenness if you do really a
>> lot of transactions, so that indexes using xxid_ops start failing, which
> 
> To be strict, that's not broken by design, that's a bug.  Nobody
> intended that there be such a limit on transactions.

It's a bug caused by an oversight in the technical implementation paired 
with a still not yet implemented feature (namely log switching, I am 
working on it for 1.2 now).


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #