Mon Jan 23 03:52:31 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] "Blueprints for High Availability"
- Next message: [Slony1-general] "Blueprints for High Availability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:32:12AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > ?hel kenal p?eval, R, 2006-01-20 kell 16:47, kirjutas Andrew Sullivan: > > > But would I use Slony as the _only_ wheel in my HA machine? Not on a > > bet. > > Wise choice, as currently Slony *IS* broken by design (see my last mail > on the subject). But you only notice this brokenness if you do really a > lot of transactions, so that indexes using xxid_ops start failing, which To be strict, that's not broken by design, that's a bug. Nobody intended that there be such a limit on transactions. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] "Blueprints for High Availability"
- Next message: [Slony1-general] "Blueprints for High Availability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list