Tue Jul 5 07:28:06 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Service handling of Slon
- Next message: [Slony1-general] RE: Service handling of Slon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> That sounds like a most interesting idea, and I'd suggest that it's not > "just for Windows" (much as pg_ctl runs everywhere). Yea, It imagines Dave now.:-) > - Control over logging... Yes, eventlog is necessary for the one for Windows. I expect pgevent again. They do the origin for include of slon-daemon. It is control by slon.conf. Probably, syslog option contains eventlog, and it is expanded. syslog plan.. 0: off 1: syslog and the standard output 2: only syslog 3: eventlog (new option) ? or , As a case of the windows 0: off 1: eventlog and the standard output 2: only eventlog Which is more suitable? Regards, Hiroshi Saito
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Service handling of Slon
- Next message: [Slony1-general] RE: Service handling of Slon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list