Jan Wieck wrote:
<snip>
> In principle, yes. The problem is that the downloads management of gborg 
> is totally bogus. You can put things there, but you can't remove or 
> update them. If you add the same file again, you have multiple entries.

Ugh, that is indeed really broken. :(


> Therefore I think it's better to have genpages with links.

Agreed.

What would be a good way of having the various Slony downloads all in 
one place?

i.e.

Source packages
***************

Slony-1.0.0 (not essential)
Slony-1.0.1 (not essential)
Slony-1.0.2

Binaries
********

Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages
Slony-1.0.2-RHEL3.rpm
Slony-1.0.2-RHEL3.srpm

Red Hat Linux 9 packages
Slony-1.0.2-RH9.rpm
Slony-1.0.2-RH9.srpm

FreeBSD packages
Slony-1.0.2.tgz (not sure of the extension for FreeBSD packages)

etc.

Although Marc prob. wouldn't be in huge favour of it, how about making a 
Slony project on SF.net, as it's toolset is pretty decent these days. 
pgFoundry was supposed to be better than GBorg, but has fallen short and 
I don't reckon it'll become scalable for months at least.  :(

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


> Jan
> 
>>
>> Regards and best wishes,
>>
>> Justin Clift
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Slony1-general mailing list
>> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
>> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 
> 
>