Thu Aug 30 04:35:33 PDT 2018
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Proposal: EXTENSION-ifying Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, David Fetter wrote: >> >> Today you can have multiple versions of slony running on the same >> instance in different slony clusters. Ie you can have _slonyschema1 >> and _slonyschema2 both running on the same database with different >> versions of slony. > > Is this an important capability in practice? > I don't know how many users are doing this or why. Maybe ask in -general? >> The .so has the version number in the filename and for the C symbols we >> encode the version number as part of the symbol name. > > It might be possible to do this inside the current framework by adding > a new EXTENSION each version and having its upgrade path include the > removal of the previous .so. It could be pretty fiddly, though. > > Best, > David. > -- > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Proposal: EXTENSION-ifying Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list