On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, David Fetter wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:30:40PM -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, David Fetter wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>

> Back to an earlier question, do we support multiple versions of Slony
> running on the same instance? If so, and we want to keep that
> capability, we might need to do some hacks to ensure that the .so's
> don't step on each other.

Today you can have multiple versions of slony running on the same instance 
in different slony clusters. Ie you can have _slonyschema1 and _slonyschema2 
both running on the same database with different versions of slony.

The .so has the version number in the filename and for the C symbols we 
encode the version number as part of the symbol name.





>
> Best,
> David.
> -- 
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>