On 06/18/2014 07:42 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
> Does anyone remember (or know) why the config.h generated by the slony
> configure defines
>
>   HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS
>
> Do don't seem to use it in the slony source.
> PG 9.4 defines this in the pg_config.h headers so we get multiple define
> warnings when we build slony against 9.4
>
> Can we just remove the define it from config.h.in  (but leave the check
> in libc.m4 as is) ?
>

I should clarify that pg_config.h prior to 9.4 had HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS 
but defined as
#define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS

verus
#define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS 1

which is why we get the warning on 9.4 but I don't see why we need to 
define this in slony's config.h when pg_config.h has this