Fri May 4 05:31:17 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] missing dstring_terminate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/2/2012 5:55 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > I think we are calling dstring_data on some strings in remote_worker.c > that are built up with _append and don't have a termination call on them. > > https://github.com/ssinger/slony1-engine/commit/e98a0567a32c81a635aff56c44b1eb45e7b4da16 > > Maybe the terminate would be done in the remote helper when we are > finished building each string but I wasn't confident on where in the > remote helper this should go. The while loop was big and had a few > breaks in it. I am more confident in the correctness of putting this here. > > Is my reasoning correct? We've had trouble with unterminated dstrings before. Maybe it is time to use a bigger hammer, always terminate the string when appending and get rid of the explicit dstring_terminate() altogether? We really don't have the need for this optimization, because slon isn't known to be a CPU hog. Jan -- Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] missing dstring_terminate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list