Tue May 25 13:18:14 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] [Slony1-general] [Slony1-bugs] Slony triggers included in pg_dump
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] A small patch for Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info>wrote: > Gurjeet Singh wrote: > > Makes sense now. But I guess the statement should have read like this: >> >> <snip> >> >> * If you restore a backup of a Slony-I node (taken by pg_dump or any >> other method), and drop the Slony-I >> namespace, this now cleanly removes /all/ Slony-I components, >> leaving the database, /including its schema,/ in a "pristine", >> consistent fashion, ready for whatever use may be desired. >> </snip> >> >> >> > Documentation patch applied. > Thanks. -- gurjeet.singh @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company http://www.enterprisedb.com singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-hackers/attachments/20100525/53487b84/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] [Slony1-general] [Slony1-bugs] Slony triggers included in pg_dump
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] A small patch for Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list