Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> I looked around in the 2.0.3 code a bit and couldn't find 
> LEGALNOTICE.html or any other file explicitly stating that Slony uses 
> the same license as PostgreSQL. IMHO, having PostgreSQL license copied 
> in LEGALNOTICE.html is not helpful either as that text does not mention 
> the word Slony anywhere, and Slony is not part of Postgres.
> 
> Dave and I had a small chat, and we are of the opinion that having a 
> LICENSE file in the top-level directory might be helpful for anyone 
> looking for this info.

There should be a 'COPYRIGHT' at the top level of the slony tree (I see 
this in both cvs for 1.2 and 2.0).  It should also be in the tarball (or 
am I mistaken on this?)

> 
> Postgres has the COPYRIGHT file, which is much easier to find and read 
> than Slony's doc/adminguide/legal.sgml
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> gurjeet.singh
> @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
> http://www.enterprisedb.com
> 
> singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
> Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
> 
> Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-hackers mailing list
> Slony1-hackers at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-hackers


-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142