Thanks. I'll let the client know the difference (or the similarity).

Any place where I can find this license in source code, or on website which
specifically says Slony-I is licensed as...

Or should I rely on the
http://www.slony.info/documentation/LEGALNOTICE.html? Which is linked
from the 'Copyright' link on
http://www.slony.info/documentation/index.html .

Regards,

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dave Page <dpage at pgadmin.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I understand that Slony is BSD licensed, but it has been pretty difficult
> > for me to find a statement declaring that. I could _somehow_ get to this:
> > http://www.slony.info/documentation/LEGALNOTICE.html but it starts with
> > 'PostgreSQL is ...'!
> >
> > Google shows that some Slony1-www  index.html files in the CVS have a
> note
> > about the BSD license, but nothing actually on the website! And I
> couldn't
> > find a LICENSE file in the source distro either. What's the official
> stand
> > of the developers anbd where can the customers' legal departments ratify
> the
> > usage of Slony?
>
> FYI, that licence is officially "The PostgreSQL Licence". It is not
> BSD, which has numbered clauses.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>



-- 
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.enterprisedb.com

singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-hackers/attachments/20100513/e4769dd0/attachment.htm