Wed Jul 7 11:22:17 PDT 2010
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] A small patch for Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I haven't tested it, but from the diff it seems that slon_kill.pl message still needs some fixing. http://main.slony.info/viewcvs/viewvc.cgi/slony1-engine/tools/altperl/slon_kill.pl?r1=1.14&r2=1.15&diff_format=h This might cause messages like: <when killing watchdog> No slon_watchdog _watchdog is running for the cluster mycluster! OR <when killing slon> No slon_watchdog is running for the cluster mycluster! Also, there are spurious spaces before the word "is"; 2 when killing watchdog, and 3 when killing slon. Regards, On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info>wrote: > Gurjeet Singh wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Attached is a patch of 2.0.3 with the following: >> >> 1) New script slonik_add_node. This adds the capability to add a node to >> the cluster. This node could be from the fact that the config file was >> edited to add new node's info, or maybe it was previously dropped from the >> cluster. >> > > This looks fine to me > > > > >> 2) An enhancement to the slonik_drop_node script. The original version >> assumed that $MASTERNODE is available for this operation to complete, but >> that might not always be the case. Now one needs to specify an event_node# >> which should be capable of sending the event notification to other nodes in >> the cluster. >> >> > This looks fine. > > > > For backward compatibility the new parameter can be made optional. >> >> 3) A minor improvement to the message emitted by slon_kill, to >> differentiate between when the Slon processes are being killed vs. when the >> watchdog processes are being killed. >> >> > I'd rather see $watchdog_suffix passed as an argument to shut_off_process > vs using a global argument. I'd also encourage declaring watchdog_suffix > with my. I know the scripts don't currently work with 'use strict' but we > should aim to get closer to that. > > Thanks for your patches. If no one else has any concerns I'll plan on > committing these to the 2.0 branch sometime next week. > > > Regards, >> -- >> gurjeet.singh >> @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company >> http://www.enterprisedb.com >> >> singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com >> Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet >> >> Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Slony1-hackers mailing list >> Slony1-hackers at lists.slony.info >> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-hackers >> > > > -- > Steve Singer > Afilias Canada > Data Services Developer > 416-673-1142 > -- gurjeet.singh @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company http://www.EnterpriseDB.com singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-hackers/attachments/20100707/9cdb27cf/attachment.htm
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] A small patch for Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list