Tue Sep 25 07:45:15 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/25/2007 4:43 AM, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 9/24/07, Jan Wieck <JanWieck at yahoo.com> wrote: >> For Slony-I specifically, we are currently developing version 2.0. This >> version will not be backwards compatible to any Postgres version before >> 8.3 because it makes use of the pg_trigger and pg_rewrite changes that >> happened there. This is required because the system catalog mucking done >> in earlier Slony versions had caused endless pain. However, the benefits >> of any kind of "commit ID" that might be coming in 8.4 will not warrant >> such backwards incompatibility again. So I doubt that Slony-I would make >> use of such feature any sooner than when we drop support for 8.3 >> somewhere in the distant future. > > To clarify the topic - the txid module in Skytools is 8byte, > non-wrapping version of xxid module in SlonyI. Upper 4 bytes > are filled with the 'wraparound epoch' which is already in core. The above was in response to Jim's "commit ID". > > First question - Are you interested in common module for this? > Eg, if it would be available in core, would you convert SlonyI 3.0 > over to it? Or, if it had been included in 8.3, would you convert > Slony 2.0 over to it? > > Basically I ask this because if you say "no, never", the code > quite likely won't get accepted into core. > > > Secondly, if you _are_ interested, maybe we can agree what the > common module will look like and ship with both SlonyI 2.0 and > Skytools? Then the Slony 2.0 could come prepared for it? You > can then drop it whenever you drop support for 8.3. Does that module also provide support for the xxid_snapshot type and associated functions like xxid_lt_snapshot()? If that is the case then there would be value in using and shipping it with Slony-I 2.0, assuming that widespread use of a common module makes adoption into core more likely. > > Ofcourse this depends on schedules you have set for yourselves > and there is no problem if you say no to that idea. > Slony-I 2.0 is supposed to be available very close to the 8.3 release. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list