Tue Sep 25 01:21:46 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/22/07, Decibel! <decibel at decibel.org> wrote: > Actually, what I'm really wondering is if a "commit ID" analogous to a > transaction ID but set at commit time (and in order of commits) would > vastly simplify things... Could you clarify? I don't get it. Assuming we keep the trigger based event logging, the event storage happens at the time of insert/update/delete statement, how can anything determined at commit time be useful? The xxid/txid usage may be slightly unobvious, but it is direct 1:1 mapping to PostgreSQL internal MVCC logic, so you can be certain that if postgres works then this also works. I see no need to replace it with something else. -- marko
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Skytools-users] [Slony1-hackers] Is everyone on the replica-hooks-discuss mailing list?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list