On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:40:01PM -0500, Decibel! wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:50:41AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:44:59PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > > On 9/20/07, Decibel! <decibel at decibel.org> wrote:
> > > > Seeing the complete duplication of txid.sql between Slony and
> > > > londiste bugs me, so I'm hoping we can come up with a replacement
> > > > for that in core, and the replica-hooks list seems the logical way
> > > > to discuss that...
> > > 
> > > You forgot to give link to list:
> > > 
> > >  http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/replica-hooks-discuss
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Compared of to rest of replica-hooks discussion, this is pretty
> > > straightforward affair, not much to discuss here.
> 
> Actually, what I'm really wondering is if a "commit ID" analogous to a
> transaction ID but set at commit time (and in order of commits) would
> vastly simplify things...
> 
> > > Only question is - Are Slony-I devs interested in common module?
> > > And do they want some changes in it?
> > 
> > What say we ask the rest of the Slony-I people, whom I'm CC'ing here :)
> 
> We want to have the discussion across 3 lists? :)

Better all at once now than a giant mess later :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <david at fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate