Uh... in light of the below (and a bunch of other bug-fixes), is there any
interest in cutting a 1.2.10 release?

Andrew


On 5/15/07, Jan Wieck <wieck at lists.slony.info> wrote:
>
> Update of /home/cvsd/slony1/slony1-engine/src/slonik
> In directory main.slony.info:/tmp/cvs-serv11261
>
> Modified Files:
>       Tag: REL_1_2_STABLE
>         slonik.c
> Log Message:
> Holy sh*t ... Slonik's SYNC command never recorded the new
> seqno in the admin conninfo. No wonder WAIT was behaving a
> little whacky!
>
> Jan
>
>
> Index: slonik.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /home/cvsd/slony1/slony1-engine/src/slonik/slonik.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.67.2.8
> retrieving revision 1.67.2.9
> diff -C2 -d -r1.67.2.8 -r1.67.2.9
> *** slonik.c    18 Apr 2007 19:28:27 -0000      1.67.2.8
> --- slonik.c    15 May 2007 16:56:37 -0000      1.67.2.9
> ***************
> *** 4235,4239 ****
>                                  stmt->hdr.script->clustername,
>                                  stmt->hdr.script->clustername);
> !       if (db_exec_command((SlonikStmt *) stmt, adminfo1, &query) < 0)
>         {
>                 dstring_free(&query);
> --- 4235,4239 ----
>                                  stmt->hdr.script->clustername,
>                                  stmt->hdr.script->clustername);
> !       if (db_exec_evcommand((SlonikStmt *) stmt, adminfo1, &query) < 0)
>         {
>                 dstring_free(&query);
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-commit mailing list
> Slony1-commit at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-commit
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-hackers/attachments/20070515/=
53571380/attachment.htm