Thu Jan 14 08:29:04 PST 2016
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Make all slon options actually settable from the command line?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon blocked by an index on a non replicated table?? 2.2.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Steve Singer <steve at ssinger.info> wrote: > My take is adding additional command line options is fine for a dot > release as long as we don't change the names of any existing options. If > anyone disagrees they should speak up. Agreed. If there are no new library dependencies and there are no changes to existing command line then there is no problem adding more.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Make all slon options actually settable from the command line?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon blocked by an index on a non replicated table?? 2.2.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list