Stéphane Schildknecht stephane.schildknecht at postgres.fr
Tue Jan 13 06:22:09 PST 2015
On 12/01/2015 11:38, Sebastien Marchand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 18 nodes, wan network.
> 2 replications ( one with 1 set and other with 2 sets ( 2 directions ) )
> First replication from server 1 to n servers ( same schema, 37 tables )
> 1 slon on server 1 and 1 slon by remote server
> Second replication : 
> set 1 : server A -> server 1 ( 90 replicated tables )
> set 2 : server A <- server 1 ( 1 replicated tables )
> do the same with 17 other servers ( one schema by server )
> 17 slons on server 1 and 1 slon by  remote server 
> database 5 gB.
> 
> I don't know if that will help...

Seems to me some information is missing. Distinction on databases, for instance.

I guess, the 2 replications are not correlated.They just share same servers.

In fact, the second replication is not 1 replication, it is 17 different
replications. But, do they all end in the same database on server A ?

-- 
Stéphane Schildknecht
Contact régional PostgreSQL pour l'Europe francophone
Loxodata - Conseil, expertise et formations

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20150113/1d77b56f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list