Wed Oct 24 17:15:58 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] pg_dump, slony databases, and locking
- Next message: [Slony1-general] pg_dump, slony databases, and locking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/24/2012 04:58 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > Arguably, the failure to restore the triggers isn't a "real" error, if > you squint at things in a particular way. > > Alternatively, I suppose you could do a separate dump of *just* the > Slony schema. That has *some* risk of locking conflict, but it should > be an entirely smaller risk, as it's not encompassing the likely-large > backup of your application's schema and data. Dump the Slony schema, > and load it first, and that would allow the > schema-excluding-Slony-bits to work. > > But my preference would be to squint at things sideways and say, "It's > OK that those triggers didn't load in." Thanks for the response (and Steve's as well). We are scripting the restore and therefore prefer to treat all errors as a failure. Unfortunately if we "allow" the restore trigger errors it will make it difficult to disallow other errors. But I guess it is something to consider. And in fact we are already dumping and restoring the slony schema separately first, and encountered the described deadlock which caused pg_dump to fail, which prompted the question in the first place. Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] pg_dump, slony databases, and locking
- Next message: [Slony1-general] pg_dump, slony databases, and locking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list