Thank you so much Steve ...

We are using Slony 2.1.x ... We are still at the initial stage only...
Slony is still trying to copy the data from source to destination host ..

>> Has your initial copy_set finished?

Here only, we are facing problem... Slony struggling to copy the data .. It
went well upto 140 GB. From 141GB onwards  the build started slow.. Now
it's very very very slow ...

Let me know if you need any configurations what we have used ...

Thanks again for your response ..

Best Regards,
Dinesh



On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info>wrote:

> On 12-06-08 02:26 PM, dinesh kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can i get any slony recommendations for the replication of 3 TB Data
>> with slony. I mean, slon configuration parameters ..
>>
>> As of now, it's copied 145 GB of data from Primary to slave and seems
>> from here onwards it's running very very very slow  .. No Errors in
>> slony logs and pg_logs ... Slon process is running with it's default
>> configuration parameters ...
>>
>
> You don't tell us what version of slony your running. I would recommend
> you run at least 2.1.x.
>
> 1.2.x and 2.0.x have a performance bug that might mean that slony can fall
> so far behind on the initial sync that it might never catch up.
>
>
>
>
>> Your help is highly appreciated ..
>>
>> Thank You,
>> Dinesh
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Slony1-general mailing list
>> Slony1-general at lists.slony.**info <Slony1-general at lists.slony.info>
>> http://lists.slony.info/**mailman/listinfo/slony1-**general<http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20120609/5aa69476/attachment.htm