I recently patched 2.1 (and 2.2) to expressly recognize Postgres 9.2, which
ought to provide an immediate resolution to the issue you're seeing.

Presumably we should tag a 2.1.3, I don't think anything stands against
that, and that would draw in a few interesting fixes.

There is still an issue in master relating to the handling of data type
namespaces that I'd think blocks releasing 2.2, just yet, but I hope Jan
has things under control to get a patch released soon.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20121228/6002ef01/attachment.htm