Sun Apr 8 06:51:02 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] confusing sl_status output and replication stalled
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Johan Wärlander <johan at snowflake.nu> wrote: > Will that do what I want, without disturbing the already-loaded tables on > the old nodes? I've never done a "set move table" so I can't say specifically, but in general slony does do what the docs say. I have done set merges before when adding new tables, and those operate flawlessly. Your strategy seems correct.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] confusing sl_status output and replication stalled
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list