Mon May 9 13:09:42 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony use cases
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony use cases
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(Please stick to plain text on the lists. Some clients can't display html email well.) On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Little, Douglas <DOUGLAS.LITTLE at orbitz.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > We use greenplum (based on PG 8.2.13) for our data warehouse. We’re on a 10node system, with 1 master that coordinates the work. We use before row triggers a lot to implement at rest encryption. I'd ask Greenplum, as I don't know how well their system works with slony. Other than that, the issues you face when dealing with a large number of objects seem lessened with slony 2.0 versus 1.2. 1.2 has some pretty pessimistic locking and as you get into the thousands of objects it can get a little slow at some things like creating a set. We replicate ~900 objects. With lots (45k) of other objects in the master database, we take up to 5 hours to create set. create set from a master without those 45k extra objects set creation takes < 5 minutes. That's with slony 1.2. We haven't (and probably wont) try slony 2.0 in production any time soon.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony use cases
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony use cases
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list