Tue Jan 18 05:04:18 PST 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] sl_status not updated, despite replication working (slony 2.0.6)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_status not updated, despite replication working (slony 2.0.6)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11-01-18 05:08 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Hi, > > I have an issue on Slony 2.0.6 and PostgreSQL 9.0.2. After stopping a > slave, waiting for a few minutes, and then starting the slave again, the > sl_status view shows a lag that keeps going up. And even if the lag keeps > going up, replication is working on all slaves. The only way to fix this is > to restart the slon daemons. > > Is this behaviour expected? AFAICT, it isn't. At least, it doesn't seem so > to Peter Geoghegan that asked many times about this issue (see "sl_status > incorrectly reports long event lag", "Error - table id 1 has already been > assigned", "Problem with Slony-I 2.0.2, sl_status persists", "Why does > sl_status event lag grow, even though events *are* replicated?", "slony I > 2.0.3" threads). The usual answer was to stick with the 1.2 branch, but it > seemed to me that 2.0.6 got rid of many bugs. > > So, is it a bug of the 2.0 branch? or is it an expected behaviour? Any > tips would be great. Are SYNC events being generated on that slave? (examin sl_event on the slave with ev_origin=$slave_id) Are the confirms for those events confirming they have been processed by the master making it back to the slave (look at sl_confirm on the slave) > > Thanks. > > Regards. > >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] sl_status not updated, despite replication working (slony 2.0.6)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_status not updated, despite replication working (slony 2.0.6)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list