Raymond O'Donnell <rod at iol.ie> writes:
> On 05/01/2011 18:20, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Hi Ray,
>>
>> On 5 January 2011 18:04, Raymond O'Donnell<rod at iol.ie>  wrote:
>>> Hi all, a quick question - can Slony-1 2.0.6 on Linux replicate to 2.0.4
>>> on Windows?
>>
>> No, it cannot. Slony versions must always be identical. There's
>> probably no good reason to not use 2.0.4 everywhere to save yourself
>> the trouble that comes with building Slony on windows (you need to use
>> mingw). The bugs fixed in 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 are pretty unlikely to
>> affect you.
>
> OK, fair enough - thanks Peter & Scott. I have 2.0.4 via Stackbuilder on 
> Windows, and I compiled 2.0.6 on Linux. I'll go back and grab 2.0.4 on 
> Linux and compile that instead.

I wouldn't think that a terribly wise wise.

Version 2.0.5 fixed a LARGE number of problems from earlier versions,
and you would lose them all by falling back to 2.0.4.

I suggest you review the release notes:
  <http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=slony1-engine.git;a=blob;f=RELEASE;h=edd1bc425167ecfb51c8fbbe0fe24e6127fe27b4;hb=refs/heads/REL_2_0_STABLE>
-- 
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'afilias.info';
Christopher Browne
"Bother,"  said Pooh,  "Eeyore, ready  two photon  torpedoes  and lock
phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"