Thu Dec 1 09:19:57 PST 2011
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Catch-up and sl_status, and yum repo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We recently had an issue with a long Slony (2.0) catch-up after 10 days of disconnect between a master and a slave. It's possible that it was caused by either bug 167 or bug 222. To test this behavior we made a dummy cluster on our local LAN, and did the following steps: 1. Initialize a two-node Slony cluster with two identical copies of the database. 2. Allow initial subscription to catch up. 3. On the slave: drop the network connection to the master. 4. On the master: run ~4 million update operations. 5. On the slave: restore the connection to the master. We did this, and I was able to watch sync events get submitted and received in the logs. However, in sl_status, st_lag_num_events and st_lag_time kept going up, and the backlogged changes were not propagated (after a couple of hours, at least). The LAN link between the two nodes is fast, and neither node is lagging due to server/IO/network load. Why is this occurring/what did I do wrong? Also, on what time period do you publish RPMs of Slony to public Yum repositories? (i.e. when should we expect to see an RPM of Slony 2.1?) Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20111201/975bada4/attachment.htm
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Catch-up and sl_status, and yum repo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list