On 10-11-18 08:11 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jaime Casanova<jaime at 2ndquadrant.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Steve Singer<ssinger at ca.afilias.info>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Other than that I am not aware of any issues 1.2 will have with 9.0.  I
>>> haven't done much testing of 1.2 with 9.0 (have others?) but while I was
>>> testing 2.0.x against 9.0 betas I don't recall seeing anything that
>>> needed back-porting.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> mmm... well, i have postgresql 9.0.1 installed on a node (this was
>> installed via the yum repository) and because the repo have 2.0.4 and
>> i don't want to kill my existing slony installation so i'm compiling
>> 1.2.21 and get this error:
>>
>
> once i solved this, i encounter another problem when trying to store
> the node with 9.0... it told me that it can't open the xxid.v84.sql
> file... i think that datatype isn't used anymore so it shouldn't be
> looking for that file at al... right?
>

This is with the tip of REL_1_2_STABLE right?

1.2 still uses xxid, (2.0 does not).

That change to add 8.4/9.0 compatibility is missing somethings (a copy 
of the xxid.v84.sql).

I propose the following patch for 1.2


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Adding-.sql-files-for-.v84.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 0 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20101118/ccbf8242/attachment.bin