Tue Nov 9 11:22:30 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Sl_log table is huge, over 100 million rows
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Sl_log table is huge, over 100 million rows
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:54 PM, sharadov <sreddy at spark.net> wrote: > > > We have slony replication set up, and the replication on the slave has > fallen behind by 10 days. On investigating I noticed that the sl_log_1 table > has 25K records, but the sl_log_2 table has over 100 million rows, and they > keep going up. How do I go about troubleshooting this? What is the output of select * from _XXX.sl_status; on your master node, where XXX is the cluster name? are the slon daemons running?
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Sl_log table is huge, over 100 million rows
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Sl_log table is huge, over 100 million rows
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list