Mon Nov 1 13:21:23 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Hirt <bhirt at me.com> writes: > If it's known that slon has problems with time zones with daylight > savings time, wouldn't it make sense to default it to UTC or at least > give you a warning when it starts up? I had no idea about this and I > could see others being bit in the rump by this as well. I've set up > my scripts to use TZ=UTC now instead of the machines local time zone > and have restarted them, but now I wonder what would have happened if > I didn't read this thread? Ooh, splendid idea! Bug #156 does "health check" stuff at startup time. Adding a timezone check which warns if you start up with an unstable/discontinuous timezone seems like a nice thing to add. > That being said wouldn't it make more sense, like the OP is saying, to > use timestamp without timezone? Why give someone a gun to shoot > themselves in the foot if it can be avoided? Actually, that's backwards. We have always used timestamp *without* timezone, and the proposal is to change to use timestamp *with* timezone. There's a small issue that "with timezone" consumes a little more space; I wouldn't consider that terribly important. In my view, to use a timezone which has a known incontinuity (e.g. - where you can expect a 1 hour "leap" every so often) *is* the footgun. -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "afilias.info") Christopher Browne "Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list