Mon Nov 1 12:06:57 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info> wrote: > If the slon processes are running in UTC/GMT, as is recommended, then > there's no issue whatever, because UTC/GMT do not adjust for DST. > I disagree. At least at some point in history this happened to me at the DST switchover: [rt]% psql -U postgres -x -c 'select * from _rt.sl_status' rt3 -[ RECORD 1 ]-------------+--------------------------- st_origin | 20 st_received | 10 st_last_event | 4896924 st_last_event_ts | 2007-11-04 01:08:57.010633 st_last_received | 4896923 st_last_received_ts | 2007-11-04 01:08:53.002901 st_last_received_event_ts | 2007-11-04 01:08:53.002292 st_lag_num_events | 1 st_lag_time | -00:59:54.583198 [rt]% date Sun Nov 4 01:09:01 EDT 2007 I'm not 100% convinced that having the slon run in UTC is sufficient for there to be "no problems" as the above is totally based on the server's idea of the time. For that full hour the lag time was off by one hour. It made for some fun nagios alerts. I guess this sunday night we can try again and see what happens... :) I don't recall what slony version that the above was from. Whatever was current at that date. And it would have been on Pg 8.1.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-general Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list