Mon Mar 8 06:04:18 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How many slaves will slony scale to for a smaller database on cheap, commodity x86 boxes?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] How many slaves will slony scale to for a smaller database on cheap, commodity x86 boxes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:58 +0000, John Moran wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Ian Lea <ian.lea at gmail.com> wrote: > > If the slaves are local i.e. LAN rather than WAN and the update volume > > is low, it should work OK. > > > > The hardware spec of the slave should be irrelevant, as long as they > > can cope with the load. > > > > > > -- > > Ian. > > Great. Is there hard data available on how well slony-I scales on a > LAN without using cascading? > Not that I am aware of. It is going to be highly dependant on the write load and speed of hardware. -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How many slaves will slony scale to for a smaller database on cheap, commodity x86 boxes?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] How many slaves will slony scale to for a smaller database on cheap, commodity x86 boxes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list