Steve Singer ssinger at ca.afilias.info
Tue Jun 22 05:07:16 PDT 2010
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi.  We've been running PostgreSQL 8.4.x with Slony 2.0.2 but want to
> move to Slony 1.2.21 due to the potential data loss issue with Slony 2.0.2.
> 
> However, Slony 1.2.21 README says that highest supported version of
> PostgreSQL is 8.2.x.
> 
> Is that information up to date?  Or is 8.4 supported?
> 

Slony 1.2.21 should be be fine with 8.4 and can be considered a 
supported version of postgresql.  I'm not aware of any current issues 
with slony and 8.4 but if you hit anything then you should bring it to 
our attention so we can look into it.  It should also work with 9.0 but 
we haven't done much testing of this combination (changes to get slony 
to compile against 9.0 are included in .21)

I've done a fair amount of testing against 2.0.4 and 9.0.  As long as 
your using 9.0 beta2 or above it seems to work okay (so far).  There was 
a Pg bug in beta1 that slony would sometimes hit but this has been fixed 
with beta2.  Strictly speaking 9.0 is still unsupported because it 
hasn't been released.


> (I have been running Slony 1.2.20 / PostgreSQL 8.4.4 in my development
> environment for a week using the RPM's from the PGDG84 YUM repo,
> and it's been working fine, but I don't want to deploy an unsupported
> configuration.)
> 
> Sincerely,
> Aleksey
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list