Tue Jun 15 09:15:25 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Huge lagging time
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Huge lagging time
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 20:24 -0300, Hernan Saltiel wrote: > Thanks, Scott & Steve for this clues! > My situation is not the PgSQL 8.0.x one, I have 8.4.x x64 installed, > and the replication schema uses an internet connection between two > DB's, a master & a slave. > Sometimes, the replication seems to stop working, I'm trying to figure > out what's wrong, if there is something. > I'll start a shell script right now to check the master & slave > systems based on the clues you sent. > Thanks again, and best regards, Does your application do any commits where you are writing a lots of data in a single transaction like batch inserts, deleting large tables or updating a lot of rows? > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Steve Singer > <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote: > Hernan Saltiel wrote: > > How can I meassure how much is too much use of my > hardware when Slony is in place? > I can meassure the CPU, memory, disk IO, and network > use, but how much is needed in order to let Slony work > well? > Is there any way to calculate this on a transaction > number and size basis? > Thanks! > > > The other thing you should look into is if your having > performance issues on your database from improper/insufficient > vacuuming. Back in the 8.0 days vacuuming issues where pretty > common (I think 8.0 was before auto-vacuum or at least before > auto-vacuum got good). > > Are your application tables bloated? > Are your slony tables bloated? > Are your vacuum processes taking a long time? > If your've had vacuum issues in the past have you exceeded the > size you've allocated to the free-space map. > > Vacuuming the entire database through a single "VACUUM" > command launched from cron is somtimes not the best approach, > sometimes you need to issue individual vacuum commands on a > per table basis where some tables get hit frequently (maybe a > few times an hour) while others might only get vacuumed once a > week. It all depends on the acccess patterns to the tables > and with older versions of postgresql the DBA is often left to > figure this out on their own. > > Also slony should be issuing vacuum commands against the slony > tables so you probably don't want 'other' vacuum commands that > regularly get run to duplicate the work. > > > > > > > > > Can someone point me where should i look into > and how to improve > replication > > performance. > > More / faster drives and controllers. > > > As of now there is no chance for upgradation of > version. > > That would be the first thing I'd recommend. Since > you can't do it, > you're gonna have to have faster hardware, > specifically the IO > subsystem. > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.slony.info> > > > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > > > > > -- > HeCSa > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > > > > -- > Steve Singer > Afilias Canada > Data Services Developer > 416-673-1142 > > > > -- > HeCSa > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Huge lagging time
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Huge lagging time
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list