Jeff threshar at torgo.978.org
Tue Jul 13 06:15:21 PDT 2010
so a while ago I posted about pg_listener vs autovacuum, however it  
seems sl_event is also nearly impossible to have vacuumed for me.    
However since then another issue has come up: sl_event cannot be  
autovacuumed.

As of earlier today the last successful autovac of sl_event on my  
origin was in may (I'd run vacuum manually a few times between then  
and now).

There is quite a lot of replication going on so it is pretty much  
constantly busy. Looking at my logs "busy" is currently defined as  
30-40M rows across various tables replicated daily.    I'm not sure  
there is much that can be done for slony 1.2  beyond scheduling some  
manual vacuuming - would 2.x be less prone to these issues?

[postgres at XXXX log]$  grep "Jul 13" pgsql.log | grep "automatic vacuum  
of table \"XXXX._replication.sl_event\"" | wc
     540    6480   59228  (this morning)
[postgres at XXXX log]$  grep "Jul 12" pgsql.log | grep "automatic vacuum  
of table \"XXXX._replication.sl_event\"" | wc
    1438   17256  157726
[postgres at XXXlog]$  grep "Jul 11" pgsql.log | grep "automatic vacuum  
of table \"XXXX._replication.sl_event\"" | wc
    1164   13968  127691

--
Jeff Trout <jeff at jefftrout.com>
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/





More information about the Slony1-general mailing list