Thu Dec 9 15:54:11 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replication schema bidrectionnal ?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Replication schema bidrectionnal ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10-12-09 04:00 PM, Jeff wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jan Wieck wrote: > > Assuming each chunk of data is isolatable (say, everything related to > branch X) > > Couldn't we create a partitioned table where we replicate say > partition1 from a->b and partition2 from b->a? > > then we'll see a happy unified view of a table.. > > That could be interesting... Now I'm thinking about a couple potential > ideas based on this. > I can't think of a reason why this wouldn't work. > -- > Jeff Trout<jeff at jefftrout.com> > http://www.stuarthamm.net/ > http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replication schema bidrectionnal ?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Replication schema bidrectionnal ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list