Fri Dec 3 07:26:42 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How stable do people feel Slony 2 is?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony Feature Brainstorming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Up to version 2.0.3, there were problems. I never tried 2.0.4 because 2.0.5 came out. It is the first version of 2.0 that is stable and works well here. Cheers, Ken On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:41:28AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > Earlier this year, Slony I 2.x was pretty unstable. I know a lot of > work as been done since then. > > I'm curious to hear "reports from the field". Our Slony I v1 clusters > are pretty stable, and while we'd like to move to more recent code, > we can't afford to sacrifice that stability. > > If folks with production experience with the newer code could chime in > about their experience, I'd greatly appreciate it. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How stable do people feel Slony 2 is?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony Feature Brainstorming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list