Kenneth Marshall ktm at rice.edu
Fri Dec 3 07:26:42 PST 2010
Up to version 2.0.3, there were problems. I never tried 2.0.4
because 2.0.5 came out. It is the first version of 2.0 that
is stable and works well here.

Cheers,
Ken

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:41:28AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> 
> Earlier this year, Slony I 2.x was pretty unstable.  I know a lot of
> work as been done since then.
> 
> I'm curious to hear "reports from the field".  Our Slony I v1 clusters
> are pretty stable, and while we'd like to move to more recent code,
> we can't afford to sacrifice that stability.
> 
> If folks with production experience with the newer code could chime in
> about their experience, I'd greatly appreciate it.
> 
> -- 
> Bill Moran
> http://www.potentialtech.com
> http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list