Fri Apr 9 09:59:15 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.2.21 rc1 + 2.0.3 rc4 released
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.2.21 rc1 + 2.0.3 rc4 released
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote: > > There should be a "chmod" that takes place somewhat automatically; I > don't want that to be an entry going onto some interminable checklist. Is there a reason why we don't want to just do a 'chmod +x' on the version file in the cvs repo on the server? That why future checkouts/exports will have configure with +x ? -- Steve Singer Afilias Canada Data Services Developer 416-673-1142
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.2.21 rc1 + 2.0.3 rc4 released
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.2.21 rc1 + 2.0.3 rc4 released
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list