Mon May 11 07:51:46 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] MOVE SET confusion
- Next message: [Slony1-general] MOVE SET confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Glyn Astill <glynastill at yahoo.co.uk> writes: > Hi chaps, > > We have a setup with 3 nodes. Initially nodes 2 and 3 were subscribed to 1, but last night I moved the origin to 2 as per the docs. > > All seems to be well, but I'm confused with what the logs are showing. Node 1 has the following in it's logs for each set; > > remoteWorkerThread_2: syncing set 2 with 43 table(s) from provider 2 > > But node 3 is saying this; > > remoteWorkerThread_2: syncing set 2 with 43 table(s) from provider 1 > > Surely when I moved the origin from node 1 to 2, both nodes should be syncing from node 2? > > Anyone? Why should this be "surely"? The subscription chain from the old origin to the new origin is reversed (see <http://slony.info/documentation/stmtmoveset.html>). The subscriptions for node #3 are only revised if they are members of the chain from the old origin to the new one. Since [1,3] is not part of the [1,2] chain, there is no need to do so. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "ofni.secnanifxunil" "@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/sgml.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #34. "I will not turn into a snake. It never helps." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] MOVE SET confusion
- Next message: [Slony1-general] MOVE SET confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list