Christopher Browne wrote:
> Joseph S <jks at selectacast.net> writes:
>> What is going on here? This reindexing has been going on for far
>> longer than the initial copy time. Any why is it reindexing? 
>> finishTableAfterCopy() should be a noop.
> 
> finishTableAfterCopy is definitely NOT a no-op - it does indeed

I guess I was confused.  I grepped the slony source and found a 
finishTableAfterCopy() in tools/slony1_dump.sh that was a noop and 
assumed that was what slony was using.