Thu Mar 5 08:52:13 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Cascaded Slaves & sl_log bloat prevention?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Cascaded Slaves & sl_log bloat prevention?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jeff <threshar at torgo.978.org> wrote: > >> Now, (before you all start saying "bah, buy more disks") things are >> fine >> under low load or smaller crunches, its just when we fire up a >> massive job >> this happens. We've got some more hardware coming in, but it will >> only >> lessen the problem, not cure it. > > If your crunching allows you do do so, you might want to poll the > current replication lag occasionally and pause the process if you are > lagged above some threshold of your choosing. Now that is an interesting idea. I'd probably put it in as a stop-gap measure though. If a crunch is already taking a while, this will just extend that, but on the upside, it won't mess up others things as much. -- Jeff Trout <jeff at jefftrout.com> http://www.stuarthamm.net/ http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Cascaded Slaves & sl_log bloat prevention?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Cascaded Slaves & sl_log bloat prevention?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list