Tue Jul 21 15:49:44 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] pg_autovacuum table gone in 8.4?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] pg_autovacuum table gone in 8.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote: > > Happily, when I "forked" the function into 8.3 and 8.4 versions, it > turns out that the API was perfectly fine for either; indeed, the > change to pull data from pg_class rather than pg_autovacuum is > relatively minor within the function. > > I just committed that to 2.0+HEAD. > Cool. My hope is that, since the slony package creates the slony tables, that you will create them with no special autovacuum settings. That way, if I have autovacuum turned on in my system, then autovacuum will vacuum all Slony tables, rather than Slony doing it. I just want to be sure that Slony doesn't ever vacuum sl_log_1 or sl_log_2, since it's a waste of time as they are truncated. Please let me know if my assumptions is wrong. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/pg_autovacuum-table-gone-in-8.4--tp24516041p24597190.html Sent from the Slony-I -- General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] pg_autovacuum table gone in 8.4?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] pg_autovacuum table gone in 8.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list