Tue Jul 14 12:45:13 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony version 1.2.x work with postgresql 8.4?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony version 1.2.x work with postgresql 8.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Sabino Mullane <greg at endpoint.com> writes: >> There were substantial changes in 8.4 to the implementation of >> pg_listener, to change from on-table storage to an in-memory handling >> that would fairly much break the whole listener loop. > > Eh? What futuristic branch are you looking at? :) The pg_listener > changes by Andrew did not make it into 8.4: it uses the pg_listener > table same as previous versions. A shame, as myself (and Bucardo) were > really looking forward to using payload messages and not having to cron > constant pg_listener vacuuming! Oh, that's something of a surprise. I had taken "must remove use of pg_listener table" as a takeaway from the 2008 PgCon, because that was to be going into 8.4. OK, so maybe reworking 1.2.x for 8.4 isn't quite so scary a quantity of work... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ca.afilias.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; <http://dba2.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land) "Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony version 1.2.x work with postgresql 8.4?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony version 1.2.x work with postgresql 8.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list