Tue Dec 22 07:37:20 PST 2009
- Previous message: [slony1-general] slony I 2.0.3
- Next message: [slony1-general] slony I 2.0.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Wieck a écrit : > On 12/11/2009 8:32 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:59 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> >>> However, I've used 1.2.15 in the past and never had any problems. It >>> might be prudent to stick to 1.2.* if everything is fine already, >> >> >> I'd recommend sticking with 1.2.x for now. >> > > I have plans for testing and doing a detailed code review. But it's > going to take some time. At this point I'd second that 2.0 is not > ready for production. It's not a really great news to read that you advise us to avoid 2.0 version in production :( -> ALREADY DONE for 6 month ago ( a few issues but not that much) > > > Jan > -- Cyril SCETBON
- Previous message: [slony1-general] slony I 2.0.3
- Next message: [slony1-general] slony I 2.0.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list